<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Shiraz University</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2981-1546</Issn>
				<Volume>33</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>03</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Comparing confidence-based and conventional scoring methods: The case of an English grammar class</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Comparing confidence-based and conventional scoring methods: The case of an English grammar class</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>123</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>152</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">3105</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22099/jtls.2015.3105</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Masoomeh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Salehi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Islamic Azad University, Shiraz Branch</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Firooz</FirstName>
					<LastName>Sadighi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Islamic Azad University, Shiraz Branch, English Department</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammad Sadegh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Bagheri</LastName>
<Affiliation>Islamic Azad University, Shiraz Branch, English Department</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>25</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>This study aimed at investigating the reliability, predictive validity, and self-esteem and gender bias of confidence-based scoring. This is a method of scoring in which the test takers receive a positive or negative point based on their rating of their confidence in an answer. The participants, who were 49 English-major students taking their grammar course, were given 8 multiple-choice tests during the semester. These tests were scored both conventionally and in a confidence-based manner, and the reliabilities of these two score sets were compared. Each score set was correlated with the final exam scores to compare their predictive validity. Gender and self-esteem bias of the confidence-based scores of the eight tests were also calculated. The results showed that there was no difference between the reliabilities of the two sets of scores. Confidence-based scores had better predictive validity than conventional scores, but this difference was not significant. Confidence-based scores were not biased against a specific gender and specific levels of self-esteem. The conclusion is that confidence-based scoring is as good as conventional scoring and the choice between these two scoring methods depends on the teacher’s discretion and the teaching context.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">confidence-based assessment</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">summative assessment</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">scoring method</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://tesl.shirazu.ac.ir/article_3105_f12428f95f7587c998d08fcd1170f24f.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
