A Corpus-based Analysis of Lexical Richness in EAP Texts Written by Iranian TEFL Students

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Department of Foreign Languages, Naein Branch, Islamic Azad University, Naein, Iran

Abstract

The literature on second/foreign language (L2/FL) discourse is replete with corpus-based studies into the use of various features representing lexical proficiency. Nonetheless, the lexical construct of English for academic purposes (EAP) texts developed by postgraduates majoring in teaching English as a foreign language (TEFL) still sounds like a relatively unexplored domain that merits further multi-dimensional investigation. To narrow the gap, the authors in the current study set out to evaluate the lexical richness of a corpus containing doctoral dissertations written by Iranian TEFL students in terms of lexical density, diversity, and sophistication. Taking advantage of the computational tool Coh-Metrix to analyze the lexical features, the corpus was analyzed in comparison with a first language (L1) baseline containing doctoral dissertations written by English native speakers. The comparative analysis of the L1 and L2 corpora revealed that the texts written by Iranian TEFL learners were lexically less diverse but more sophisticated. Additionally, the lexical density of the L2 corpus exceeded that of the L1 one in terms of nouns and adjectives. Based on the results drawn from a discriminant function analysis (DFA), the features representing lexical sophistication and density were found to be the best predictors of lexical richness since they could significantly discriminate between the two sub-corpora. The findings may provide new insights into the ways of evaluating and enhancing the lexical richness of FL/L2 written discourse.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Bickman, L., & Rog, D. J. (1998). Handbook of applied social research methods. London: Sage Publications.
Breeze, R. (2008). Researching simplicity and sophistication in student writing. International Journal of English Studies, 8(1), 51–66.
Bulté, B., & Housen, A. (2014). Conceptualizing and measuring short-term changes in L2 writing complexity.   Journal of Second Language Writing, 26(4), 42–65.
Chen, Y. H., & Baker, P. (2010). Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing. Language Learning and Technology, 14(2), 30–49.
Chenoweth, N. A., & Hayes, J. R. (2001). Fluency in writing. Generating text in L1 and L2. Written Communication, 18(1), 80-98.
Clark, E. V. (1978). Discovering what words can do. In D. Farkas, W. M. Jacobsen, & K. W. Todrys (Eds.), Papers from the parasession on the lexicon (pp. 34–57). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Cobb, T., & Horst, M. (2004). Is there room for an AWL in French? In P. Bogaards & B. Laufer (Eds.), Vocabulary   in a second language (pp. 15-38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Crossley, S. A. & McNamara, D. S. (2009). Computationally assessing lexical differences in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 119–135.
Crossley, S. A., & Kyle, K. (2018). Assessing writing with the tool for the automatic analysis of lexical sophistication     (TAALES). Assessing Writing, 38, 46–50.
Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2011). Understanding expert ratings of essay quality: Coh-Metrix analyses of first and second language writing. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life   Long Learning, 21(3), 170–191.
Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2012). Predicting second language writing proficiency: The     roles of cohesion and linguistic sophistication. Journal of Research in Reading, 35(2), 115–135.
Crossley, S. A., Salsbury, T., McCarthy, P. M., & McNamara, D. S. (2008). Using latent semantic analysis to explore second language lexical development. In D. Wilson & G. Sutcliffe (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st international Florida artificial intelligence research society (pp.136–141). Menlo Park, California: AAAI Press.
Crossley, S., Weston, J., McLain Sullivan, S., & McNamara, D. (2011). The development of writing proficiency as a function of grade level: A linguistic analysis. Written Communication, 28, 282–311.
Daller, H., Milton, J., & Treffers-Daller, J. (eds) (2007). Modeling and assessing vocabulary knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Djiwandono, P. (2016). Lexical richness in academic papers: A comparison between students’ and lecturers’ essays. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 209–216.
Douglas, S. R. (2010). Non-native English speaking students at university: Lexical richness and academic success (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB.
Engber, C. A. (1995). The relationship of lexical proficiency to the quality of ESL compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4, 138–155.
Douglas, S. R. (2013). The lexical breadth of undergraduate novice level writing competency. The Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 152–170.
Failasofah, F., & Alkhrisheh, H. T. D. (2018). Measuring Indonesian students’ lexical diversity and lexical sophistication. Indonesian Research Journal in Education, 2(2), 97–107.
Grant, L., & Ginther, A. (2000). Using computer-tagged linguistic features to describe L2 writing differences. Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 123–145.
Gregori-Signes, C., & Clavel-Arroitia, B. (2015). Analyzing lexical density and lexical diversity in university students’ written discourse. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 198, 546–556.
Grobe, C. (1981). Syntactic maturity, mechanics, and vocabulary as predictors of quality ratings. Research in the Teaching of English, 15(1), 75–85.
Ha. H. S. (2019). Lexical richness in EFL undergraduate students’ academic writing. English Teaching, 74(3), 3–28.
Hasselgren, A. (1994). Lexical teddy bears and advanced learners: A study into the ways Norwegian students cope with English vocabulary. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4, 237–258.
Higginbotham, G., & Reid, J. (2019). The lexical sophistication of second language learners’ academic essays. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 35, 127-140.
Hinkel, E. (2005). Analyses of L2 text and what can be learned from them. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 615–628). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hinkel, E. (2011). What research on second language writing tells us and what it doesn’t. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 523-538). New York: Routledge.
Hirvela, A. (2011). Writing to learn in content areas: Research insights. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.). Learning-to-write   and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 37-59). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jarvis, S. (2002). Short texts, best-ļ¬tting curves and new measures of lexical diversity. Language Testing, 19, 57–84.
Johansson, V. (2009). Lexical diversity and lexical density in speech and writing: A developmental perspective. Working Papers in Linguistics, 53, 61–79.
Juanggo, W. (2018). Investigating lexical diversity and lexical sophistication of productive vocabulary in the written discourse of Indonesian EFL learners. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 38–48.
Jurafsky, D., & Martin, J. (2002). Speech and language processing. New Delhi: Pearson Education Inc.
Kalantari, R., & Gholami, J. (2017). Lexical complexity development from dynamic systems theory perspective: Lexical density, diversity, and sophistication. International Journal of Instruction, 10(4), 1–18.
Kim, S., & Jeon, M. (2016). An analysis study of English writing of elementary school 6th grade English language   learners using Coh-Metrix. Modern English Education, 17(3), 263–287.
Kojima, M., & Yamashita, J. (2014). Reliability of lexical richness measures based on word lists in short second language productions. System, 42, 23–33.
Kusumaningrum, M. V., & Ardi, P. (2020). A corpus analysis of lexical sophistication in LLT journal: A journal on language and language teaching. ELTR Journal, 4(1), 53–75.
Kwon, S. (2009). Lexical richness in L2 writing: How much vocabulary do L2 learners need to use? English Teaching,           64(3), 155–174.
Kyle, K., & Crossley, S. A. (2015). Automatically assessing lexical sophistication: Indices, tools, findings, and application. TESOL Quarterly, 49, 757–786.
Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1995). Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics, 16, 307–322.
Lavallée, M., & McDonough, K. (2015). Comparing the lexical features of EAP students’ essays by Prompt and Rating. Revue TESL du Canada, 32(2), 30–44.
Malvern, D., Richards, J. B., Chipere, N., & and Durán. P. (2004). Lexical richness and language development: Quantification and assessment. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Meara, P. (2005). Lexical frequency profiles: A Monte Carlo analysis. Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 32–47.
Meara, P., & Bell, H. (2001). P Lex: a simple and effective way of describing the lexical      characteristics of short L2 texts. Prospect, 16(3), 5–19.
Morris, L., & Cobb, T. (2004). Vocabulary profiles as predictors of the academic performance of teaching English as a second language trainees. System, 32, 75–87.
Muncie, J. (2002). Process writing and vocabulary development: comparing lexical frequent profiles across drafts. System, 30, 225–235.
Nation, I. S. P., & Meara, P. (2010). Vocabulary. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), An introduction to applied linguistics (pp. 34 –52). London, Hodder Education.
O'Loughlin, K. (1995). Lexical density in candidate output on direct and semi-indirect versions of an oral proficiency test. Language Testing 12(2), 217–237.
Read, J. (2000). Assessing Vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sasaki, M. (2007). Effects of study-abroad experience on EFL writers: A multiple-data analysis. The Modern Language Journal, 91 (4), 602-620.
Schleppegrell, M. J., & Go, A. L. (2007). Analyzing the writing of English learners: A functional approach. Language           Arts, 84(6), 529–538.
Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Schoonen, R., Snellings, P., Stevenson, M., & Van Gelderen, A. (2009). Towards a blueprint of the foreign language writer: The linguistic and cognitive demands of foreign language writing. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing   in foreign language contexts. Learning, teaching and research (pp. 77–101). Bristol, UK: Multilingual        Matters.
Silva, T. (1993). Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of second language writing: The ESL research and its implications. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 657–677.
Šišková, Z. (2012). Lexical richness in EFL students’ narratives. Language Studies Working Papers, 4, 26–36.
Staehr, L. S. (2008). Vocabulary size and the skills of listening, reading and writing. Language Learning Journal, 36(2), 139–152.
Storch, N., & Tapper, J. (2009). The impact of an EAP course on postgraduate writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8(3), 207–223.
Vermeer, A. (2004). The relation between lexical richness and vocabulary size in Dutch L1 and L2 children. In P.   Boogards & B. Laufer (Eds.), Vocabulary in a second language: Selection, acquisition, and testing (pp. 173         –189). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Vongpumivitch, V., Huang, J., & Chang, Y. (2009). Frequency analysis of the words in the academic word list (AWL)    and non-AWL content words in applied linguistics research papers. English for Specific Purposes, 28, 33     –41.
Zheng, Y. (2016). The complex, dynamic development of L2 lexical use: A longitudinal study on Chinese learners of           English. System, 56, 40–53.
Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly (Formerly Journal of Teaching Language Skills)
Volume 40, Issue 4
November 2021
Pages 61-90

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 28 March 2021
  • Revise Date: 12 July 2021
  • Accept Date: 17 July 2021

Share

How to cite

Statistics