Ahmadi, S. D., & Marandi, S. S. (2014). Social software in the classroom: The case of wikis for scaffolding. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 100-108. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.394
Arnaudet, M. L., & Barrett, M. E. (1990). Paragraph development (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.
Armstrong, J., & Franklin, T. (2008).
A review of current and developing international practice in the use of social networking (Web 2.0) in higher education. Retrieved November 27, 2017, from
http://opus.bath.ac.uk/17702/
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C., & Razavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Atkinson, D. (2003). L2 writing in the post-process era: Introduction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12 (1), 3-15. doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(02)00123-6
Atkinson, D., & Connor, U. (2008). Multilingual writing development. In C. Bazerman (Ed.), Handbook of research on writing: History, society, school, individual, text (pp. 515-532). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bagheri, M. S., Behjat, F., & Yamini, M. (2013). Blending technology in writing instruction. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education, 3(2), 422-437.
Barab, S. A., Evans, M. A., & Baek, E. (2004). Activity theory as a lens for characterizing the participatory unit. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed.) (pp. 199-214). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Baskaran, L., & Shafeeq, C. P. (2015). ESL teachers’ perception of CALL integration in ELT. IJSELL, 3(5), 63-74.
Behrend, M. B. (2014). Engeström’s activity theory as a tool to analyze online resources embedding academic literacies. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 8 (1), 109-120.
Brine, J. & Franken, M. (2006). Students' perceptions of a selected aspect of a computer-mediated academic writing program: An activity theory analysis. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(1), 21-38. doi:10.14742/ajet.1305
Casanave, C. P. (2003). Looking ahead to more socio-politically oriented case study research in L2 writing scholarship. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(1), 85-102. doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(03)00002-x
Chapelle, C. (1998). Multimedia CALL: Lessons to be learned from research on instructed SLA. Language Learning and Technology, 2(1), 22-34.
Che Wan Ibrahim, C. W. I. R. (2013).
Perceived affordances and learning strategies of Malaysian university students in web 2.0-based informal learning of English as a second language: A mixed methods study (Doctoral dissertation, Latrobe University). Retrieved November 29, 2017, from
http://arrow.latrobe.edu.au/store/3/5/0/5/3/public/Master version.pdf
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). London: Routledge Falmer.
Dörnyei, Z. (2003). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Oriental-Konsultit.
Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19-38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Erguvan, D. (2015). Comparing instructors’ and students’ perceptions towards CALL in higher education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 1056-1062. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.578
Gedera, D. S. P. (2011). Integration of weblogs in developing language skills of ESL learners. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 7(2), 124-135.
Gordon, L. (2008). Writing and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (Ed.), Lessons from good language learners (pp. 244-254). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gifford, B. R., & Enyedy, N. D. (1999). Activity centered design. Proceedings of the 1999 Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL’99), Palo Alto, CA, 189-196. doi:10.3115/1150240.1150262
Haines, K. (2015). Learning to identify and actualize affordances in a new tool. Language Learning & Technology, 19(1), 165-180.
Harmer, J. (2004). How to teach writing. Essex, UK: Pearson Education.
Jacobs, H. L., Zinkgraf, S. A., Wormuth, D. R., Hartfiel, V. F., & Hughey, J. B. (1981). Testing ESL composition: A practical approach. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Lantolf, J. P., & Pavlenko, A. (2001). Second language activity theory: Understanding language learners as people. In M. P. Breen (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research (pp. 141-158). Essex, UK: Pearson Education.
Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leffa, V. J. (2009). CALL as action. In R. C. V. Marriott & P. L. Torres (Eds.), Handbook of research on e-learning methodologies for language acquisition (pp. 39-52). New York: Information Science Reference. doi:10.4018/978-1-59904-994-6
Matsuda, P. K., Canagarajah, A. S., Harklau, L., Hyland, K., & Warschauer, M. (2003). Changing currents in second language writing research: A Colloquium. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 151-179. doi:10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00016-X
Nami, F. (2015). The impact of individual differences on students’ perception of writing practice in the blogosphere. In M. Rahimi (Ed.), Handbook of research on individual differences in computer-assisted language learning (pp. 251-270). Hershey, Pennsylvania: IGI Global. doi: 10.4018/978-1-4666-8519-2.
Ozturk, K. (2012). Students’ perceptions of CALL at Dokuz Eylül University school of foreign languages. ELT Research Journal, 1(4), 216-229.
Pennington, M. C. (2004). Electronic media in second language writing: An overview of tools and research findings. In S. Fotos & C. Browne (Eds.), new perspectives on CALL for second language classrooms (pp. 69- 92). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Portnov-Neeman, Y., & Barak, M. (2013). Exploring students’ perceptions about learning in school: An activity theory based study. Journal of Education and Learning, 2(3), 9-25. doi:10.5539/jel.v2n3p9
Seyyedrezaie, Z. S., Ghonsooly, B., Shahriari, H., & Fatemi, A. H. (2016). A mixed methods analysis of the effect of google docs environment on EFL learners’ writing performance and causal attributions for success and failure. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 17(3), 90-110. doi:10.17718/tojde.34418
Shams-Abadi, B. B., Ahmadi, S. D., & Mehrdad, A. G. (2015). The effect of Edmodo on EFL learners’ writing performance. International Journal of Educational Investigations, 2(2), 88-97.
Slavkov, N. (2015). Sociocultural theory, the L2 writing process, and Google drive: Strange bedfellows? TESL Canada Journal, 32(2), 80-94. doi:10.18806/tesl.v32i2.1209
Son, J. (2007). Learner experiences in web-based language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(1), 21-36. doi:10.1080/09588220601118495
Thorne, S. L. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 38-67.
Van Lier, L (2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 245-259). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Warschauer, M. (2007). Technology and writing. In C. Davison & J. Cummins (Eds.), The international handbook of English language teaching (Vol. 2, pp. 907-912). Norwell, MA: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-46301-8_60
Weigle, S. C. (2014). Considerations for teaching second language writing. In M. Celce Murcia, D. M. Brinton, & M. A. Snow (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (4thed., pp. 222-237). Boston, MA: National Geographic Learning.
', './data/jtls/coversheet/cover_en.jpg'))