Socio-Cultural Determinants of Teacher–Student Relationships in Iranian EFL Contexts

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of English language, University of Zabol, Sistan and Balouchestan, Iran

Abstract

Teacher–Student Relationships (TSRs) influence classroom realities and educational experiences. This study examines the socio-cultural factors that shape these relationships in the Iranian EFL context. Adopting a Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT) design, the study employed an iterative data collection and analysis process. Sixteen participants (10 university ELT educators and 6 EFL teachers) were recruited through purposive and theoretical sampling. Data were generated through semi-structured interviews and life-history narratives and analyzed using the constant comparative method, including initial, focused, and theoretical coding, to develop a context-sensitive explanatory framework. The findings reveal three main socio-cultural factors shaping TSRs. Authoritative culture promotes power imbalance and restricts meaningful interaction. Collectivist culture substitutes genuine collaboration with group conformity. Content-focused education prioritizes syllabus coverage and summative assessment at the expense of dialogic teaching and reciprocal engagement. The study advances three interconnected theoretical concepts—Authority–Relationship Tension Cycle, Harmonized Collectivism vs. Collaborative Personalization, and Reciprocal Scaling of Content and Learning Conditions—to explain how these factors interact to constrain constructive TSRs. The findings carry important pedagogical implications. First, teacher education programs should critically address hierarchical norms. Second, instructional practices should balance authority with relational engagement. Third, curriculum and assessment reforms should create space for dialogic, needs-responsive teaching. By situating TSRs within their socio-cultural ecology, this study provides a contextually grounded framework for rethinking relational pedagogy in exam-oriented educational systems.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Andrade, H. L., & Brookhart, S. M. (2020). Classroom assessment as the co-regulation of learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 27(4), 350–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2019.1571992
Khani, F., & Gaskaree, B. L. (2024). English as a foreign language teachers’ cognition on teacher–student relationships: Voices from Iran. English Teaching & Learning, 48(4), 603–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-023-00158-5
Bakadorova, O., & Raufelder, D. (2018). The essential role of the teacher-student relationship in students’ need satisfaction during adolescence. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 58, 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2018.08.004
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed). SAGE Publications.
Cheung, S. K. S., Wang, F. L., Kwok, L. F., & Poulova, P. (2021). In search of the good practices of personalized learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(2), 179–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1894830
Claessens, L. C. A., van Tartwijk, J., van der Want, A. C., Pennings, H. J. M., Verloop, N., den Brok, P. J., & Wubbels, T. (2017). Positive teacher–student relationships go beyond the classroom; problematic ones stay inside. Journal of Educational Research, 110(5), 478-493. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2015.1129595
Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 113-143. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298563
Diamond, A. (2010). The evidence base for improving school outcomes by addressing the whole child and by addressing skills and attitudes, not just content. Early Education and Development, 21(5), 780–793. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2010.514522
Ghasemi, F. Exploring middle school teachers’ perceptions of factors affecting the teacher–student relationships. Educ Res Policy Prac 21, 201–216 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-021-09300-1
Hagenauer, G., Muehlbacher, F., & Ivanova, M. (2023). “It’s where learning and teaching begin ‒ is this relationship?” — insights on the teacher-student relationship at university from the teachers’ perspective. Higher Education, 85(4), 819–835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00867-z
Hagenauer, G., & Volet, S. E. (2014). Teacher–student relationship at university: An important yet under-researched field. Oxford Review of Education, 40(3), 370–388. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 03054 985. 2014. 921613
Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2001). Early teacher-child relationships and the trajectory of children’s school outcomes through eighth grade. Child Development, 72(2), 625–638. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1132418
Horowitz, L. M., & Strack, S. (2011). Handbook of interpersonal psychology: theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic interventions. Wiley.
Hsieh, H. (2011). Challenges facing Chinese academic staff in a UK university in terms of language, relationships and culture. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(4), 371–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2011.641001
Imants, J., & Van der Wal, M. M. (2019). A model of teacher agency in professional development and school reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 52(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2019.1604809
Karpouza, E., & Emvalotis, A. (2018). Exploring the teacher-student relationship in graduate education: a constructivist grounded theory. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(2), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1468319
Komarraju, M., S. Musulkin, and G. Bhattacharya. (2010). Role of student–faculty interactions in developing college students’ academic self-concept, motivation, and achievement. Journal of College Student Development, 51 (3): 332–342. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0137.
Lee, J.-S. (2012). The effects of the teacher–student relationship and academic pressure on student engagement and academic performance. International Journal of Educational Research, 53, 330–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.04.006
Liang, Y., & Matthews, K. E. (2022). Are Confucian educational values a barrier to engaging students as partners in Chinese universities? Higher Education Research & Development, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2022.2138276
Markey, P., Funder, D., & Ozer, D. (2003). Complementarity of interpersonal behaviors in dyadic interactions. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1082-1090. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203253474
Murray, G. (2009). Narrative inquiry. In J. Heigham & R. A. Croker (Eds.), Qualitative research in applied linguistics: A practical introduction (pp. 45–65). Palgrave Macmillan.
Olszewska, A. I., Bondy, E., Hagler, N., & Kim, H. J. (2021). A humanizing pedagogy of engagement: Beliefs and practices of award-winning instructors at a U.S. university. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(7), 1671–1687. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1920575
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Quin, D. (2017). Longitudinal and contextual associations between teacher–student relationships and student engagement: a systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 345-387. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316669434
Reeves, J. (2018). Teacher identity work in neoliberal schooling spaces. Teaching and Teacher Education, 72, 98-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.03.002
Salazar, M. del C. (2013). A humanizing pedagogy: Reinventing the principles and practice of education as a journey toward liberation. Review of Research in Education, 37(1), 121-148. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X12464032
Stenalt, M. H., & Lassesen, B. (2021). Does student agency benefit student learning? A systematic review of higher education research. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(5), 653–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1967874
Tassell, N. A., Flett, R. A., & Gavala, J. R. (2010). Individualism/Collectivism and Academic Self-Enhancement in New Zealand Māori University Students. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 4(2), 138-151. https://doi.org/10.1375/prp.4.2.138
Thornberg, R., Forsberg, C., Chiriac, E. H., & Bjereld, Y. (2020): Teacher–student relationship quality and student engagement: A sequential explanatory mixed-methods study. Research Papers in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2020.1864772
Veldman, I., van Tartwijk, J., Brekelmans, M., & Wubbels, T. (2013). Job satisfaction and teacher–student relationships across the teaching career: Four case studies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 32, 55-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.01.005
Wanders, F. H. K., Dijkstra, A. B., Maslowski, R., & Veen, I. V. D. (2020). The effect of teacher-student and student-student relationships on the societal involvement of students. Research Papers in Education, 35(3), 266–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2019.1568529
Williams, E. N., & Morrow, S. L. (2009). Achieving trustworthiness in qualitative research: A pan-paradigmatic perspective. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 576–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 10503 3008027021 13
Wirth, K. R. (2007). Teaching for deeper understanding and lifelong learning. Elements, 3(2), 107–111. https://doi.org/10.2113/gselements.3.2.107
Wubbels, T., & Brekelmans, M. (2005). Two decades of research on teacher–student relationships in class. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(1–2), 6-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2006.03.003
Wubbels, T., Brekelmans, M., den Brok, P., Wijsman, L., Mainhard, T., & van Tartwijk, J. (2014). Teacher-student relationships and classroom management. In E. T. Emmer, E. Sabornie, C. Evert-son, & C. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 363–386). Routledge
Xiao, Y., & Yang, M. (2019). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: How formative assessment supports students’ self-regulation in English language learning. System, 81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.01.004
Zhou, Y., Jindal-Snape, D., Topping, K., & Todman, J. (2008). Theoretical models of culture shock and adaptation in international students in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 33(1), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701794833
Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly
Volume 45, Issue 3
June 2026
Pages 71-90

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 27 December 2025
  • Revise Date: 18 April 2026
  • Accept Date: 02 May 2026

Share

How to cite

Statistics