Document Type : Research Paper


1 Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran

2 Department of English Language Teaching, College of Humanities, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran


The present study aimed to find out thematic organization and progression in the argumentative writing of Iranian learners of English, representing two levels of language proficiency, and the introduction section of published Research articles (RAs) of Applied Linguistics. For this aim, 60 articles were downloaded from three journals and also 92 MA and BA students majoring in English Language Teaching and English Literature were selected. Then, three topics were used for gathering data from them. Of the written argumentative compositions, only 67 were chosen for the next phase of the study. These compositions together with the RAs were analyzed based on Halliday’s (1985) model of thematic structure and the revised model of Danes’ (1974) thematic progression patterns. The results of Chi-square suggested that there was a significant difference in the thematic structure of the essays written by MA students and the introduction section of RAs. It was concluded that thematicity can be effectively applied in classrooms to help students in writing. Students will know where they are losing their effectiveness in their arguments due to problems with either thematic progression or thematic selection, or both. The findings of this study can be effectively applied in teaching writing skills.


Belmonte, I. A., & McCabe-Hidalgo, A. (1998). Theme-rheme patterns in L2 writing. TESOL, 10, 13-31.
Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coffin, C., & Hewings, A. (2005). IELTS as preparation for tertiary writing: Distinctive interpersonal and textual strategies. In L. J. Ravelli & R. A.  Ellis (Eds.), analysing academic writing (pp. 153-171).London: Continum.
Coulthard, M. (1994). Advances in written text analysis. London: Routledge.  
Fontain, L., & Kodratoff, Y. (2003). The role of thematic and concept texture in scientific text: comparing native and non-native writers of English. Special Issue Asp. Retrieved June 3, 2014, from:,pdf
Fries, P. (1983). On the status of theme in English: Arguments from discourse. In J. S. Petofi & E. Sozer (Eds.), micro and macro convexity of texts (pp. 116-152). Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.  
 Fries, P. (1990, 7). Exploring theme: Problems for research. Paper presented at 17th International Systemic Congress, Stirling, Scotland. 
Fries, P. H. (1995). Themes, methods of development and texts. In R. Hasan & P. H. Fries (Eds.), on subject and theme: A discourse functional perspective (pp. 317-359). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Ghadessy, M. (1999). Thematic organization in academic article abstracts. Estudios Ingleses de la Univesidad Complutense, 7, 141-161.
Gomez, M. A. (1994). The relevance of theme in the textual organization of BBC news reports. World Journal, 19, 293-305.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
Jakeman, V. & McDowell, C. (2009). Cambridge practice tests for IELTS. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jalilifar, A. R. (2010a). Thematization in EFL students’ composition writing and its relation to academic experience. RELC Journal, 41(1), 31- 45.
Jalilifar, A. R. (2010b). The status of theme in applied linguistics articles. The Asian ESP Journal, 6(2), 7-39.
Jianghong, M., Hairong, W., & Xiangfeng, C. (2005). Implications and applications of theme-rheme theory to the teaching of EFL reading. Celea Journal, 28, 18-22.
Martinez, I. A. (2003). Aspects of theme in the method and discussion sections of biology journal article in English. Journal of English for Academic Purpose, 2, 103-23.
Matthiessen, C., & Halliday, M. A. K. (1997). Systemic functional grammar: A first step into the theory. Retrieved September 5, 2014, from http://www.SFGintro (peng chapter)
McCabe, A. (1999). Theme-rheme patterns in L2 writing. TESOL, 10, 13-31.
North, S. (2005). Disciplinary variation in the use of theme in undergraduate essays. Applied Linguistics, 26, 431-452.
Ostrom, J., & Cook, W. (1993) Paragraph writing simplified. New York: HarperCollins College Publishers.
Rafiei, K., & Modirkhamene, S. (2012). Thematicity in published vs. unpublished Iranian TEFL theses. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(6), 1206-1213.
Ramage, J. D., Bean, J. C., & Johnson, J. (2009). Writing arguments: A rhetoric with readings (8th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research setting. Cambridge: CUP.
Thornbury, S. (1999). How to teach grammar. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
Wang, I. (2007). Theme and rheme in the thematic organization of texts: Implications for teaching academic writing. Asian EFL Journal, 9(1), 164-176.
Whittaker, R. (1995). Thematic development in academic and non-academic texts. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), thematic development in English texts (pp. 105-128). London: Printer.
Zhou, Y. (2006). The interpersonal metafunction and theme in English and Chinese advertisement texts. US-China Foreign Language, 4, 46-50.