Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Dept. of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Humanities, Arak University, Arak , Iran

2 Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Persian Literature and Foreign Languages, Arak University, Arak, Iran

Abstract

L2 language socialization asks how learners come to gain the ability to write appropriately and sufficiently in an institutional academic community of practice. In the same line, this study focuses on the process of socialization of an Iranian English L2 essay writing class in the context of higher education. The theoretical backgrounds rely on the socialization and Vygotsky's sociocultural theories. Three case studies were analyzed throughout six weeks. The learners' essays, outlines, and reflective diaries were analyzed to trace their development in appropriating academic discourse and argumentation. Also, an interview session was held at the end of the study in which the issues regarding the whole experience of socialization were discussed with the participants. The results suggested that each learner pursued their path of socialization based on their individual and social needs of the academic discourse community. Accordingly, a model demonstrating their paths of development is presented. The model shows that the new-comers to this social site of engagement were mediated by the old-timer agent of practice (instructor) to appropriate the values, principles, and behaviors of this community of practice through the activities they were engaged in.

Keywords

Amerian, M., Ahmadian, M., & Mehri, E. (2014). Sociocultural theory in practice: the effect of teacher, class, and peer scaffolding on the writing development of EFL learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 3(5), 1-12.
Belcher, D. (1994). The apprenticeship approach to advanced academic literacy: graduated students and their mentors. English for Specific Purposes, 13(1), 23-34.
Block, D. (2003). The social turn in second language acquisition. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. USA: Stanford University Press.
Bunch, G. C. (2009). "Going up there": challenges and opportunities for language minority students during a mainstream classroom speech event. Linguistics and Education, 20, 81-108.
Davis, K. (1995). Qualitative theory and methods in applied linguistic research. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 427-454.
Doughty, C. J., & Long, M. H. (2003). The scope of inquiry and the goals of SLA. In C. J. Doughty, & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 3-16). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Duff, P. A. (2003). New directions and issues in second language socialization research. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 3, 309-331.
Duff, P. A. (2007). Second language socialization as a sociocultural theory: Insights and issues. Language Teaching, 40, 309-319.
Duff, P. A. (2010). Language socialization into academic discourse communities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 169-192.
Ellis, R. (1997). SLA and language pedagogy: an educational perspective. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 93-116.
Flowerdew, J. (2000). Discourse community, legitimate peripheral participation, and the nonnative-English-speaking scholar. TESOL Quarterly, 34(1), 127-150.
Frawley, W., & Lantolf, J. P. (1985). Second language discourse: a Vygotskyan perspective. Applied Linguistics, 6, 19-44.
Garnet, P. B., & Baquedano-Lopez, P. (2002). Language socialization: reproduction and continuity, transformation and change. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31, 339-361.
Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2001). Second language acquisition: an introductory course. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2001). Toward a post method pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 35(4), 537-560.
Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2007). Reflecting on the cognitive-social debate in second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 91, 773-787.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Long, M. H. (1997). Construct validity in SLA research: a response to Firth and Wagner. Modern Language Journal, 81, 318-323.
Mehri, E., & Amerian, M. (2015). Group dynamic assessment (G-DA): the case for the development of control over past tense. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 4(5), 11-20.
Mitchell, R., & Myles, F. (1998). Second language learning theories. London: Arnold.
Morita, N. (2004). Negotiating participation and identity in second language academic communities. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 573-603.
Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ritchie, C., & Bhatia, T. (Eds.) (1996). Handbook of second language acquisition. London: Academic Press.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking. NY: Oxford University Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Cultural, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Willett, J. (1995). Becoming first graders in an L2: an ethnographic study of L2 socialization. TESOL Quarterly, 29(3), 473-503.
Zuengler, J., & Cole, K. M. (2005). Language socialization and L2 learning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp.301-316). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.