Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Ilam University

Abstract

Since its introduction in 1980, the concept of Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) has attracted much attention. Although many studies have been conducted in science and mathematics, there are insufficient studies to capture the PCK of EFL (English as a foreign language) teachers. Accordingly, the present study aimed to unearth EFL teachers' PCK through a grounded theory approach in the Iranian context. To this end, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 English teachers at senior high schools in three provinces of Ilam, Lorestan, and Kermanshah. The transcribed interviews were analyzed using coding procedures. The results yielded five main dimensions of EFL teachers' pedagogical content knowledge: English language proficiency knowledge, pedagogy knowledge, student knowledge, curriculum knowledge, and assessment knowledge. Data analysis also revealed the sources of EFL teachers' PCK construction and demonstrated that contextual and intervening conditions influence EFL teachers' PCK enactment. The findings may have theoretical and practical implications for high school EFL teachers, educators, and education programs.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Abell, S. (2008). Twenty years later: Does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea?. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1405-1416. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802187041
Andrews, S. J. (1997). Metalinguistic awareness and teacher explanation. Language Awareness, 6(2), 147–161.
Andrews, S. J. (2003). Teacher language awareness and the professional knowledge base of the L2 teacher. Language Awareness, 12(2), 8–195.
Bertram, A., & Loughran, J. (2012). Science teachers' views on CoRes and PaP-eRs as a framework for articulating and developing pedagogical content knowledge. Research in Science Education, 42(6), 10-27.
Borg, S. (2006). The distinctive characteristics of foreign language teachers. Language Teaching Research, 10 (1), 3-31.
Bukova-Guzel, E. (2010). An investigation of pre-service mathematics teachers' pedagogical content knowledge, using solid objects. Scientific Research and Essays, 5, 1872-1880.
Cambridge English Teaching Framework. (2015). Cambridge English teaching framework. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Canagarajah, S. (2013). Trans-lingual practice: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan relations. New York, NY: Routledge
Cesur, K., & Ertas, A. (2018). Examining the prospective English teachers' pedagogical content knowledge: Canakkale Case. International Journal of Progressive Education, 14(3), 123-140.
Creswell, J. W., Hanson, W. E., Plano, V. C., & Morales, A. (2007). Qualitative research designs: Selection and implementation. The Counseling Psychologist, 35, 236-264.
Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. Teachers College Press, Teachers College, Columbia University.
Freeman, D. (2002). The hidden side of the work: Teacher knowledge and learning to teach. Language Teaching, 35, 1-13.
Freeman, D., & Johnson, K. E. (1998). Reconceptualizing the knowledge-base of language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 32(3), 397-417.
Geddis, A. N. (1993).Transforming subject‐matter knowledge: the role of pedagogical content knowledge in learning to reflect on teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 15(6), 673-683.
Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK: Results of the thinking from the PCK summit. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Reexamining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp.28–42). Routledge.
Gholami, K., & Husu, J. (2010). How do teachers reason about their practice? Representing the epistemic nature of teachers' practical knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26 (8), 1520-1529.
Hardwood, N. (2010). Issues in materials development and design. In N. Hardwood (Ed.), English language teaching and materials (pp. 3-32). Cambridge; CUP.
Hashweh, M.Z. (2005). Teacher pedagogical constructions: a reconfiguration of pedagogical content knowledge. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 11(3), 273-292.
Isiksal, M., & Cakiroglu, E. (2011). The nature of prospective mathematics teachers' pedagogical content knowledge: The case of multiplication of fractions. Math Teacher Education, 14(3), 213–230.
Jing-Jing, H. (2014). A critical review of pedagogical content knowledge' components: nature, principle and trend. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(4).
Johnston, B., & Goettsch, K. (2000). In search of the knowledge base of language teaching: Explanations by experienced teachers. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 56,437-468.
Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: Perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45,169-204.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching. From method to post-method. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Jamieson, I. (1994). Experimental learning in the context of teacher education. In G. Harvard, & P. Hodkinson (Eds.), Action and reflection in teacher education (pp. 35-54). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.  
Loughran, J., Berry, A., & Mulhall, P. (2012). Pedagogical content knowledge. In Understanding and developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. 7-14.
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching introduction. In J. Gess-Newsome and N. G. Lederman (Eds.). PCK and Science Education, 95-132.
National Curriculum Document (2012). Ministry of Education, Tehran (In Persian). Available online at: http://dca.razaviedu.ir/files/posts/24364.pdf
Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261-284.
Richards, J. C. (2010). Competence and performance in language teaching. RELC Journal, 41 (2), 101-122.
Sadeghi, K., & Richards, J. C. (2016). The idea of English in Iran: An example from Urmia. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development,  37(4).
Safari Asl, E., Safari Asl, N., & Safari Asl, A. (2014). The erosion of EFL teachers' content and pedagogical content knowledge throughout the years of teaching experiences. Presented in International Conference on Current Trends in ELT. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1599 – 1605.
Shariatifar, S., Kiany, G., & Maftoon, P. (2017). High School EFL Teachers’ Professional Competencies: Content Knowledge and Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Applied Research on English Language, 6 (4), 499-522.
Shulman, L.S. (1986).Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14.
Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-21.
Strauss, A., & Corbin J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications, London.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Thornbury, S. (1997). About language: Tasks for Teachers of English. Cambridge University Press.
Van Driel, J., Verloop, N., & De Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 673–695.
Verloop, N., Van Driel, J. & Meijer, P. (2002). Teacher knowledge and the knowledge base of teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 35,441-461.
Wang, L. (2020). Exploring EFL teachers' pedagogical content knowledge for teaching speaking in Chinese universities: a multiple case study. Open Access Theses and Dissertations. 823.
Watzke, J. L. (2007). Foreign language pedagogical knowledge: Toward a developmental theory of beginning teacher practices. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 63-82.