Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

University of Isfahan

Abstract

Flow, introduced as one of the founding concepts in positive psychology by Csikszentmihalyi (1990), refers to the complete absorption in a challenging mental, emotional, or physical task to the exclusion of attention to any other surrounding thing. Since the Covid-19 pandemic, whole aspects of human life have changed, and language learning is no exception. The present study explored various obstacles in experiencing flow among Iranian EFL learners while completing tasks in three different modalities: face-to-face (F2F), text-based, and audio-based interaction during the Covid-19 pandemic. The data were elicited from 55 upper-intermediate learners divided into three groups completing the tasks in pairs, each through one of the three modalities, as a part of their classroom activity. Immediately following class time, they were interviewed individually or through group chats via WhatsApp. Under the three different modalities, the qualitative content analysis identified obstacles in achieving flow and categorized them into five themes. The results revealed that the main barriers in the face-to-face group were related to contextual or environmental factors as well as to task-induced issues. However, technological, task-based, and teacher-related factors gained higher percentages among text-based and audio-based interaction themes. The findings offer insight into flow perception by second language learners in different task modalities during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Keywords

Main Subjects

The authors declare that there were no conflicts of interest and received no funding for this study.

Allo, M. D. G. (2020). Is online learning good in the midst of Covid-19 Pandemic? The case of EFL learners. Jurnal Sinestesia, 10(1), 1-10.
Amini, D., Ayari, S., & Amini, M. (2016). The effect of flow state on EFL learners' vocabulary learning. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 3(5), 9-18.
Aubrey, S. (2017). Inter-cultural contact and flow in a task-based Japanese EFL classroom. Language Teaching Research, 21(6), 717-734.
Bozdoğan, D. (2015). MALL revisited: Current trends and pedagogical implications. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 932-939.
Carli, M., Fave, A. D., & Massimini, F. (1988). The quality of experience in the flow channels: Comparison of Italian and US students.
Chastain, K. (1976). Developing second-language skills: Theory to practice: Rand McNally College Publishing Company.
Cho, M. (2018). Task Complexity and Modality: Exploring Learners' Experience From the Perspective of Flow. The Modern Language Journal, 102(1), 162-180.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco. CA, US: Jossey-Bass.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow the psychology of optimal experience.: Harper Collins.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding flow the psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York: Basic books.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (2014). Flow and the foundations of positive psychology (Vol. 10): Springer.
Czimmermann, É., & Piniel, K. (2016). 8 Advanced Language Learners' Experiences of Flow in the Hungarian EFL Classroom Positive Psychology in SLA (pp. 193-214): Multilingual Matters.
Derakhshan, A. (2021). Emergence distance education (EDE) role in the learning of English language skills during COVID-19 pandemic. Teaching English as a Second Language (Formerly Journal of Teaching Language Skills), 40(3), 41-82.
Dina, A. T., & Ciornei, S.-I. (2013). The advantages and disadvantages of computer assisted language learning and teaching for foreign languages. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 76, 248-252.
Egbert, J. (2004). A study of flow theory in the foreign language classroom. Canadian modern language review, 60(5), 549-586.
Engeser, S., & Rheinberg, F. (2008). Flow, performance and moderators of challenge-skill balance. Motivation and Emotion, 32(3), 158-172.
Esteban-Millat, I., Martínez-López, F. J., Huertas-García, R., Meseguer, A., & Rodríguez-Ardura, I. (2014). Modelling students' flow experiences in an online learning environment. Computers & Education, 71, 111-123.
Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (2007). Second/foreign language learning as a social accomplishment: Elaborations on a reconceptualized SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 800-819.
Grabowski, J. (2010). Speaking, writing, and memory span in children: Output modality affects cognitive performance. International journal of psychology, 45(1), 28-39.
Hamilton, J. A., Haier, R. J., & Buchsbaum, M. S. (1984). Intrinsic enjoyment and boredom coping scales: Validation with personality, evoked potential and attention measures. Personality and individual differences, 5(2), 183-193.
Hassani, V. (2021). The Impacts of COVID-19 Pandemic on English Language Teacher Education in Iran: Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 40(3), 83-116.
Herring, S. C. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives (Vol. 39): John Benjamins Publishing.
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27(1), 1–12.
Jackowicz, S., & Sahin, I. (2021). Online Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Issues, Benefits, Challenges, and Strategies: ISTES Organization Monument, CO, USA.
Kim, H. Y. (2014). Learning opportunities in synchronous computer-mediated communication and face-to-face interaction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 26-43.
Kirchhoff, C. (2013). L2 extensive reading and flow: Clarifying the relationship. Reading in a foreign language, 25(2), 192-212.
Kurniawati, N., Maolida, E. H., & Anjaniputra, A. G. (2018). The praxis of digital literacy in the EFL classroom: Digital-immigrant vs. digital-native teacher. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 28-37.
Mirlohi, M., Egbert, J., & Ghonsooly, B. (2011). Flow in translation: Exploring optimal experience for translation trainees. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies, 23(2), 251-271.
Norouzifard, A., Bavali, M., Zamanian, M., & Rassaei, E. (2021). The Effect of Augmented Reality on Adult EFL Learners’ Attitudes and Motivation: A Mixed Methods Study. Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly (Formerly Journal of Teaching Language Skills).
Piniel, K., & Albert, Á. (2017). L2 motivation and self-efficacy's link to language learners' flow and antiflow experiences in the classroom. UZRT 2016 Empirical Studies in Applied Linguistics, 90-103.
Piniel, K., & Albert, Á. (2019). Motivation and flow The Palgrave handbook of motivation for language learning (pp. 579-597): Springer.
Reid, D. (2004). A Model of Playfulness and Flow in Virtual Reality Interactions. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 13(4), 451-462. doi:10.1162/1054746041944777
Shahnama, M., Yazdanmehr, E., & Elahi Shirvan, M. (2021). Challenges of Online Language Teaching during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Process Tracing Approach. Teaching English as a Second Language (Formerly Journal of Teaching Language Skills)40(3), 159-195.
Swaffar, J., Romano, S., Markley, P., & Arens, K. (1998). Language learning online. Theory and Practice in the ESL and L2 Computer Classroom. Austin, Texas: Labyrinth Publications.
Tardy, C., & Snyder, B. (2004). That's why I do it: flow and EFL teachers' practices. ELT Journal, 58(2), 118-128. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/58.2.118
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language (E. Hanfmann & G. Vakar, trans.): Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Yuksel, D., & Inan, B. (2014). The effects of communication mode on the negotiation of meaning and its noticing. ReCALL, 26(3), 333-354.
Zare-ee, A. (2013). The Experience of the Psychological State of Flow: The Relationship between Flow and Undergraduate Reading in English as a Foreign Language. International Journal of Psychology (IPA), 7(1).