Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of English Language Teaching, West Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Imam Ali University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

This study, contrary to the conventional research on PCK, which attempted to enhance the teachers’ PCK and single out its driving factors, aims to use PCK as an outcome-based lens for evaluating Iranian EFL teachers’ programs. To this end, two current EFL teacher-education programs (i.e., State and Islamic Azad universities on the one hand and Farhnagian Teacher Education University on the other), each with its specific approach to developing EFL teachers’ PCK, were selected. Along with administering a glocally developed and validated PCK questionnaire among 263 student-teachers, this study ran a one-on-one semi-structured interview with 80 student-teachers to capture a crystal-clear evaluation of the outcomes the programs were to cultivate. The results of running qualitative and MANOVA analysis methods showed the student-teachers trained in the program with a more finely-tuned PCK instruction, which was accompanied by four continuous courses of teaching internship, were more cognizant of the role of PCK in their professional development and enjoyed a statistically significant index of developed PCK. Although there existed some similarities between these programs in terms of reviewing high school English course books, evaluation and assessment, and applying technology in teaching English, student-teachers in both programs were not completely aware of different components of PCK, including curriculum design and materials development, language teachers’ technological knowledge, and professional development. The results imply that content knowledge, PCK, and internship should be fettered together. The findings suggest that EFL teachers’ PCK can be applied as an effective lens for delving deeply into teacher training programs.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Abedini, M., & Sabbaghan, M. (2015). PCK in green chemistry education. Journal of Iranian Chemical Society, 18, 25-35.
Abeywickrama, K. R. W. K. (2021). Professional development and ESL teacher quality: An empirical study. Sri Lanka Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(2), 51-58.
Alavi Moghadam, S.A., Amiri, M., Soelimani, M., Ghodusi, F., Ghorbn Dordi Nejad, F., Karbala’i, A. R., & Nejati, R.  (2014). TEFL curriculum for BA. Tehran: Farhangian Teacher Education University.
Alimirzaee, H., & Ashraf, H. (2016). On the effect of online peer knowledge sharing on Iranian EFL teachers’ professional development. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(1), 134.
Blömeke, S., Suhl, U., & Kaiser, G. (2011). Teacher education effectiveness: Quality and equity of future primary teachers’ mathematics and mathematics pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education62(2), 154-171.
Canagarajah, S. (2012). Translingual practice: Global Englishes and Cosmopolitan Relations. Routledge.
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd Ed.). Sage.
Cochran, K. F., DeRuiter, J. A., & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education44(4), 263-272.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement. Education policy analysis archives8, 1-1.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Teacher learning that supports student learning. Teaching for intelligence2(1), 91-100.
Darling-Hammond, L., Newton, S. P., & Wei, R. C. (2013). Developing and assessing beginning teacher effectiveness: The potential of performance assessments. Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Accountability25, 179-204.
Dashtestani, R. (2014). Computer literacy of Iranian teachers of English as a foreign language: Challenges and obstacles. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning9(1), 87-100.
Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press.
Evens, M., Tielemans, K., Elen, J., & Depaepe, F. (2019). Pedagogical content knowledge of French as a foreign language: differences between pre-service and in-service teachers. Educational Studies45(4), 422-439.
Fernandez, C. (2014). Knowledge base for teaching and pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): Some useful models and implications for teachers’ training. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 60, 79-100.
Fritsch, S., Berger, S., Seifried, J., Bouley, F., Wuttke, E., Schnick-Vollmer, K., & Schmitz, B. (2015). The impact of university teacher training on prospective teachers’ CK and PCK–a comparison between Austria and Germany. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training7, 1-20.
Gao, L. X., & Zhang, L. J. (2020). Teacher learning in difficult times: Examining foreign language teachers’ cognitions about online teaching to tide over COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 11:549653, 1-14. https://HYPERLINK "https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.549653"doi.orgHYPERLINK "https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.549653"/10.3389/HYPERLINK "https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.549653"fpsyg.2020.549653
Gatbonton, E. (2008). Looking beyond teachers’ classroom behavior: Novice and experienced ESL teachers’ pedagogical knowledge. Language teaching research12(2), 161-182.
Gess-Newsome, J., Taylor, J. A., Carlson, J., Gardner, A. L., Wilson, C. D., & Stuhlsatz, M. A. (2019). Teacher pedagogical content knowledge, practice, and student achievement. International Journal of Science Education41(7), 944-963.
Kind, V. (2015). On the beauty of knowing then not knowing. Pinning down the elusive qualities of PCK. In A. Berry, P.J. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp.178-195). London: Routledge.
Kind, V. (2019). Development of evidence-based, student-learning-oriented rubrics for pre-service science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education41(7), 911-943.
König, J., Lammerding, S., Nold, G., Rohde, A., Strauß, S., & Tachtsoglou, S. (2016). Teachers’ professional knowledge for teaching English as a foreign language: Assessing the outcomes of teacher education. Journal of teacher education67(4), 320-337.
Kleickmann, T., Richter, D., Kunter, M., Elsner, J., Besser, M., Krauss, S., & Baumert, J. (2013). Teachers’ content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: The role of structural differences in teacher education. Journal of teacher education64(1), 90-106.
König, J., Lammerding, S., Nold, G., Rohde, A., Strauß, S., & Tachtsoglou, S. (2016). Teachers’ professional knowledge for teaching English as a foreign language: Assessing the outcomes of teacher education. Journal of teacher education67(4), 320-337.
Kultsum, U. (2017, August). The Concept of Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK): Recognizing the English Teachers’ Competences in Indonesia. In 2nd International Conference on Innovative Research Across Disciplines (ICIRAD 2017) (pp. 55-59). Atlantis Press.
Liu, S. (2013). Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Case Study of ESL Teacher Educator. English Language Teaching6(7), 128-138.
Loewenberg Ball, D., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education59(5), 389-407.
Irvine‐Niakaris, C., & Kiely, R. (2015). Reading comprehension in test preparation classes: An analysis of teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in TESOL. Tesol Quarterly49(2), 369-392.
Maghsoudi, M., & Khodamoradi, A. (2020). A critical analysis of the latest curriculum for English language teacher education at Farhangian University. Journal of Critical Literature and Humanities, 19(11), 273-297.
Maghsudi, M. (2021). A reflection on the undergraduate teaching English as a foreign language curriculum at Farhangian University from TPACK perspective. Foreign Language Research Journal, 11(2), 181-202. doi:10.22059/jflr.2021.316601.794
Mavhunga, E. (2020). Revealing the structural complexity of component interactions of topic-specific PCK when planning to teach. Research in Science Education50, 965-986.
Mavhunga, E., & Rollnick, M. (2011). The development and validation of a tool for measuring topic-specific PCK in chemical equilibrium. In Proc. ESERA Conf.
McNamara, C. (2006). Field guide to nonprofit program design, marketing, and evaluation. Authenticity Consulting. Retrieved from http://HYPERLINK "http://www.authenticityconsulting.com/"www.authenticityconsulting.comHYPERLINK "http://www.authenticityconsulting.com/"/ pubs/PG_gdes/PG-toc.pdf
Nilsson, P., & Loughran, J. (2012). Exploring the development of pre-service science elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Science Teacher Education23(7), 699-721.
Ozden, M. (2008). The Effect of Content Knowledge on Pedagogical Content Knowledge: The Case of Teaching Phases of Matters. Educational sciences: theory and practice8(2), 633-645.
Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008a). National board certification (NBC) as a catalyst for teachers’ learning about teaching: The effect of the NBC process on candidate teachers’ PCK development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(7), 812-834.
Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008b). Revisiting the conceptualization of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261-284.
Peacock, M. (2009). The evaluation of foreign-language teacher education programs. Language Teaching Research, 13, 259-278.
Ravandpour, A. (2019). The relationship between EFL teachers’ continuing professional development and their self-efficacy: A structural equation modeling approach. Cogent Psychology, 6(1), 1568068.
Rollnick, M., & Mavhunga, E. (2015). The PCK summit and its effect on work in South Africa. In A. Berry, P.J. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp.135-146). London: Routledge.
Shing, C. L., Saat, R. M., & Loke, S. H. (2018). The knowledge of teaching-pedagogical content knowledge (PCK). MOJES: Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences3(3), 40-55.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
van Driel, J. (2021). The development of pre-service chemistry teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. In Science Teachers’ Knowledge Development (pp. 157-191). Brill.
Washburn, E. K., Binks-Cantrell, E. S., Joshi, R. M., Martin-Chang, S., & Arrow, A. (2016). Pre-service teacher knowledge of basic language constructs in Canada, England, New Zealand, and the USA. Annals of dyslexia66, 7-26.